p 163-3a

These days, almost all nations are enacting laws to allow people to help a patient die and regulating its action through various and strict laws. This trend has become controversial at issue. Some people who believe in god or have religion insist that allowing people to help a patient die is obviously homicide. However, others who have thought that future and present time in so important disagree with it. Two opinions have been opposed each other.

It is very difficult for a family to decide whether one of the family member, who has serious diseases or involved in miserable accident and he or she can not do any mental and physical activities should die or not, if the family love him or her.

We see and here about Marin’s case and their family’s decision. I think we never criticize other people’s decision made by them.

Although all people should be protect by law (Bill of Law regulate and show that the right of all people are equal) if they are patient and the disabled or not, I think the right of other people is more important than the right of patient, who could be kept alive by the machines and is not unconscious. That’s because although we can not guess whether patient be alive or not, we see that other family members will have lived.

I think that Martin’s family members should help a patient die and Martin’s family should consider themselves. Although they love him, he might not want to be placed in painful situations in which family members are going to suffer form various factors such as money problem, nursing and so on because Martin he also love them.
Obviously, a few people will abuse a law as to way they kill people and ignore the right of patient. Although at that time other family member might sufferfrom serious critics, and have hard time to die one of the family member they might enjoy more comfortable and convenient after time passes.